King Charles Warns Meghan to Stop Deceiving Royals and Leaks Archie's Fake Reality

Since their son Archie’s birth in 2019, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have maintained a protective shield around him, keeping him largely out of the public eye. Despite their prominent media presence, both Archie and his sister, Lilibet, have been kept away from the limelight.

Birth Certificate Oddities

When Archie’s birth certificate was released, royal watchers were quick to spot an oddity: Harry was listed as “His Royal Highness Henry Charles Albert David Duke of Sussex,” with no mention of “Prince.” This was surprising, especially since both Prince William and King Charles were referred to as “His Majesty” on their children’s birth certificates. For example, William is noted as “His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis Duke of Cambridge” on the birth certificates of his children, while King Charles is titled “His Royal Highness King Charles Philip Arthur George Prince of Wales” on the birth certificates of William and Harry.

The birth certificate also dispelled some rumors about Archie’s birth, revealing that Meghan gave birth at London’s Portland Hospital, a private facility, contrary to reports of a home birth. Meghan was listed as “Rachel Meghan Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex,” with her occupation recorded as “Princess of the United Kingdom.” Archie was born at 5:26 a.m. on May 6th. An official statement from Buckingham Palace confirmed Harry’s presence at the birth and mentioned that Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, was with them at Frogmore Cottage, elated by the arrival of her first grandchild.

LATEST ROYAL NEWS:

Lilibet’s Birth

On June 4, 2021, Harry and Meghan welcomed their second child, a daughter named Lilibet Diana, in Santa Barbara. Lilibet’s birth certificate interestingly listed Harry using his HRH title, with his surname as HRH and his first name as “The Duke of Sussex.” Meghan was recorded as “Rachel Markle,” with Meghan as her middle name. This was an unexpected decision, as they had been told that they would not be able to use their SAR shares after retirement at the beginning of 2020.

Controversial Verification

A YouTube video by Paula M detailed her attempt to verify the specifics of Archie’s birth by contacting the Palace. She was directed to submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the House of Commons. Despite a delay due to the dissolution of Parliament, she eventually received a surprising response. Charles’ office reportedly continued to doubt Diana’s credibility, including attempts at reconciliation after the publication of Andrew Morton’s book.

The response from Parliament revealed a troubling lack of documentation regarding Archie’s birth, raising questions about his place in the line of succession under the Succession to the Crown Act 2013. Traditionally, strict protocols, including the presence of the Home Secretary, ensured the legitimacy of royal births. However, in Archie’s case, these protocols appear to have been circumvented. The absence of essential documents, despite promised transparency, has given rise to calls for clarity and accountability.

Paula M stressed the importance of maintaining the integrity of the succession process and ensuring that all legal requirements are met. She promised to continue to seek answers and hold those responsible to account to preserve the credibility of the royal family.